A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It can be very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Online access to civil and criminal cases in select circuit courts. Cases could possibly be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
Life imprisonment is really an alternative towards the death penalty. In this sort of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to spend the remainder of their natural life powering bars.
Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, like Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this form of law strives to form our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be unachievable for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed by the respondent/Institute, these rules might not have the operates within a transparent legal and regulatory framework from the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what has been discussed higher than, without touching the merits from the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability from the petition is sustained plus the petition is held for being not maintainable in terms of Article 199 on the Constitution to the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio with the judgment passed through the Supreme Court during the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
be set up without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This can be a horrifying reality, an extremely lower threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
Upholding Justice: The application in the regulation and the subsequent punishment on the guilty party give a perception of closure and justice towards the victim’s family and loved types.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the assorted decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences might not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
Criminal cases Inside the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil law systems, common regulation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.
To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the most important tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to complete, i.e. safe its citizens.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in more info their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution gives authentic jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to choose up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.